Singapore Banking Monthly – Tepid but stable loans growth November 5, 2019 693

  • Singapore loans growth for September was tepid but stable at 2.1% YoY.
  • Consumer loans contracted for the sixth consecutive month (-1.2% YoY), dragged by weakness in housing loans (-1.3% YoY).
  • 3M SIBOR down 7bps to 1.806%, while 3M SOR plunged 17bps to 1.515%.
  • CASA growth recovered to 0.9% YoY after almost a year of contraction; while FD kept up its strong momentum at 20.3% YoY.
  • In 1Q20 (Jul – Sep), SGX DDAV grew 12% YoY and SDAV growth recovered to -1% YoY as compared to quarterly average contraction of -16% YoY in FY19.
  • Maintain the Singapore Banking Sector at Overweight. The banks are offering dividend yield of 4.6% to 5.0%, well capitalised and enjoying 5-9% earnings growth.


Singapore’s loans growth tepid but stabilised.

Latest statistics from MAS reported loans growth of 2.1% YoY for September, in line with YTD average loans growth of 2.3% YoY. Business loans growth of 4.5% YoY offset some of the contraction in consumer loans growth of 1.2% (Figure 1). Building & construction loans (+8.8% YoY) held up growth due to the progressive drawdown of loans from existing projects in the pipeline. Consumer loans contracted for the sixth consecutive month, dragged by persistent weakness in housing loans contraction of 1.3% YoY due to property cooling measures. We expect loans growth for the Singapore banks to slow to 4-5% for FY19e (2018: 7-11%) due dampened business sentiments from continued macroeconomic weakness.


Deposits – FD kept up the momentum while CASA growth recovered from contraction.

In September, CASA growth continued its recovery to 0.9% YoY after almost a year of contraction. FD kept up its strong momentum at 20.3% YoY in September, outpacing overall deposits growth of 8.5% YoY (Figure 2).

Following interest rates cuts in the U.S., some banks in Singapore lowered their fixed deposit rates (Figure 3). We reiterate our expectations of easing competition for FD in 2020 due to further rate cut expectations and slower global economic growth. As the banks release excess FD, funding pressure should ease and offset some of the impact of lower interest rates.

Despite the recent Fed rate cuts and downward adjustments of FD rates, FD is still growing strongly. We believe that one of the reasons for sustained demand for FD was due to the saturation of appetite for Singapore Savings Bond (SSBs). The total amount applied for SSBs in October and September was S$51mn and S$58mn respectively, down from the peak of S$457mn in February and YTD average of S$252mn.

In addition, tight liquidity in the banking sector sustained the competition for deposits, making it difficult to lower FD rates too much in the near term. Hence investors would still opt for banks’ FD with higher rates (Figure 3) as compared to 1.56% for a 12 months tenure for SSBs.


3M SIBOR down 7bps MoM to 1.806%, while 3M SOR plunged 17bps to 1.515%.

Meanwhile, the savings rate in Singapore remained unchanged at 0.16% (Figure 5). Expectations of further interest rate cuts in the U.S. will limit the upside for NIM expansion. NIM should be softer on a quarterly basis in 2H19. However, as FD rates start to trend down due to slowing economic growth, lower funding costs could offset some of the impact of lower interest rates on NIM. Hence, we still expect the banks to deliver full-year NIM improvements due to the lagged effect of loan repricing, albeit at a lower magnitude of around 1-4 bps in FY19e.


Volatility – a favourable backdrop for derivatives.

Recall that two months ago Trump announced tariff hikes on 1 August 2019 and even further back, on 5 May 2019 when Trump unleashed tariff hikes. These two tariff events created the two most volatile months for global stocks this year. We saw SGX’s DDAV (derivatives daily average volume) spike 54% YoY and 33% YoY in May and August respectively, in correlation with heightened volatility. In 1Q20, derivative volume and DDAV trended at 14% YoY and 12% YoY respectively. Meanwhile, SGX’s SDAV growth for 1Q20 recovered to -1% YoY as compared to quarterly average contraction of -16% YoY in FY19.

In the near term, trade tensions between the U.S. and China might continue to escalate and create volatility in the market. With increased uncertainties due to trade and geopolitical tensions, investors hedge more and derivative products are the rare beneficiaries of a volatile environment. SGX’s derivative products capture global flows and are not as reliant on local liquidity as the securities business.


Hong Kong’s loans growth inched higher at 6.3% YoY in September.

Hong Kong’s loans grew at a respectable pace of 6.3% YoY despite high interest rates and lingering geopolitical tensions. Residential sales and purchase value in September fell 24% MoM while volumes fell 16% MoM. Home prices in Hong Kong recovered back to levels similar to a year ago (Figure 11). Meanwhile, 3-month HIBOR fell 10bps MoM to 2.166% (Figure 10).


Investment Actions

Maintain the Singapore Banking Sector at Overweight. While the trade war affects investor sentiments in the near term, we believe the banks’ healthy fundamentals remain intact to withstand the volatile environment and deliver growth.

Operating environment remains stable despite slowing regional growth. Asset quality remains benign with NPL ratio at 1.5% (Figure 14) across all 3 banks. We believe the increasing diversification of the banks’ business into more stable fee income (loan, credit card, wealth management etc) will help reduce the proportion of earnings arising from volatile revenue streams (trading income, investment gains etc). Better cost management with digitalisation and low provisions in a benign credit environment should provide upside to ROEs. The banking sector provides an attractive dividend yield support of c.5%, backed by healthy capital ratios.

With the expectation of at least one more rate cut this year, we expect downside risks to NIM to be slightly offset by better deposits mix with the release of excess fixed deposits, lagged effect for loans to be repriced downwards and a potential rise in volumes.

UOB remains as our top pick because of its exposure to trade war effects being relatively muted as compared to its peers. We are attracted to its defensive traits and steady earnings with high visibility. As of 2Q19, UOB’s profit before tax arising from Greater China and Hong Kong loans is 13% (DBS: 27% and OCBC: 20%) (Figure 15).


Our recommendation will be subject to changes based on the following re-rating catalysts.


(i) Miss in CIR % target due to higher spending on investments.

(ii) Limited rise in interest rates and rising competition resulting in lower than expected NIM.

(iii) Volatility leading to higher capital market-linked revenue losses.

(iv) Changes in market-linked assumptions resulting in higher ECL.

(v) Deterioration in portfolio quality.


(i) Earlier than expected CIR % improvement with digitisation.

(ii) Better credit quality leading to higher writebacks and recoveries.

(iii) Stronger than expected growth in non-interest income revenue streams.




Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

About the author

Profile photo of Tin Min Ying

Tin Min Ying
Research Analyst
Phillip Securities Research Pte Ltd

Min Ying covers the Banking and Finance sectors. She has experience in external audit and corporate tax roles.

She graduated with a Bachelor of Accountancy with a major in Finance from SMU.

Get access to all the latest market news, reports, technical analysis
by signing up for a free account today!